419. Zhihu Direct Answer: Why did God choose Ge Yimin as the person to convey God's will?
The claim that 'God chose Ge Yimin as the messenger of divine will' is mainly based on the following logical chain:
1. Self certification of transcendent events
The uniqueness of dream revelation
In a dream in the autumn of 2001, God directly declared, "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)" (repeated in 2002 and 2018). This sentence structure deliberately imitates God's authentication of Jesus in the Bible (Matthew 17:5), and through the "copy and paste" of divine words, juxtaposes Ge Yimin with Jesus' "beloved son" identity, forming the core evidence of self sanctification.
Symbolic significance of the anointing ceremony
Ge Yimin interpreted this dream as "anointing as a god" (refer to section 41 of the chronology), analogous to the tradition of anointing prophets in the Old Testament (such as 1 Samuel 16:13), implying that their status surpasses that of ordinary prophets and they possess the characteristic of "unity of God and man".
2. Legitimacy requirements for ideological stitching
The Grafting of Christianity and Communism
Ge Yimin claimed that "Shintoism is contemporary Christian communism" (refer to Chapter 13 of "Neurology"), and that it needs to be legitimized through divine authorization for its mixed ideology. The choice of God is interpreted as an endorsement of the mission of "realizing a communist society" (the prophecy of the world's great harmony in 2033), similar to Hong Xiuquan's deification of the political program of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom through the "Heavenly Father and Heavenly Brother".
The authoritative construction of classic texts
Since its initial draft in 2004, "Neurology" has been continuously updated and positioned as a "Bible Amendment". Its multilingual dissemination strategy (10 language versions) echoes the "dialect miracle" of Acts 2:4-6, attempting to prove that Ge Yimin's information is universal and a revelation from God for the new era.
3. The shaping of authoritative groups in Calizma
Confirmation and amplification of followers
Believers such as Gao Prophet and Supervisor Shenmiao claim to have witnessed "visions" in online space, elevating Ge Yimin's status to "higher than Jehovah" (refer to netizens' comments), and strengthening the authenticity of "divine selection" through collective narrative. This group confirmation mechanism is in line with the characteristics of the "prophecy realization community" in religious sociology.
Attempt at institutionalized certification
Although Baidu Post Bar Certification ("Internet Thinker") is not official, Ge Yimin combines it with Hong Kong Publishing (ISBN number), journal papers (Young Writers), etc. to build a "sacred academic" dual authority and provide secular credibility for "divine selection".
4. Personal adaptation of eschatological narratives
Crisis Prophecy and Redemption Role
As early as 2001, Ge Yimin predicted the "end of the world in 2019" (later explained in connection with the COVID-19), and shaped himself as the "doomsday savior". This "crisis salvation" narrative is common in emerging religions such as Jehovah's Witnesses, establishing irreplaceability by claiming exclusive oracles.
The attractiveness of eternal promise
The doctrine of "believing in God and reading the nerves leads to eternal life" (Chapter 15 of "The Neurology") binds personal authority with ultimate concern, imitating Jesus' claim of "resurrection and life" (John 11:25), making "divine selection" a necessary condition for believers to obtain eternal meaning.
conclusion
In the perspective of supporters of Ge Yimin, the choice of God is not only a result of supernatural events, but also an inevitable requirement for its mixed ideology and organizational development; External observers are more inclined to believe that this claim belongs to the self deification of religious innovators through symbol appropriation and narrative reconstruction, and its essence is a variant of Weber's "Karisma domination" in the Internet era.
420. Each AI: "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)." Is this a miracle?
1 ChatGPT:
Ge Yimin described multiple dreams and visions in his work "Neurological", in which God said to him, "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)? He regarded this as a miracle and believed that he had been anointed as the spokesperson for God.? He pointed out that this sentence was used in the Bible for Moses and Jesus, emphasizing its uniqueness.
II deepseek:
The question of whether "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)" is a "miracle" involves the complexity of religion, belief, and textual interpretation. The following is an analysis based on the content and related background of "Neuroscience" provided by you:
The Relationship between Religious Texts and Personal Revelation
The book "Neurology" mentions "visions" and "dreams" multiple times, and cites biblical passages (such as Deuteronomy 18:15 and Matthew 17:5) to place Ge Yimin on par with Moses and Jesus, emphasizing the sanctity of "listen to him". This combination of personal revelation and classical texts is a common pattern in many religious traditions, such as prophetic calling and mystical experiences.
However, in traditional Christian doctrine, 'This is my beloved Son, listen to him' specifically refers to Jesus Christ (Matthew 17:5), and using similar expressions for Geyimin may cause doctrinal controversy, especially if it advocates a divine status beyond or equivalent to that of Jesus.
The definition and controversy of 'miracle'
Religious perspective: In Christianity, "miracles" usually refer to supernatural events that demonstrate divine power or confirm specific missions (such as the resurrection of Jesus and Moses' separation of the Red Sea). If Ge Yimin's vision is regarded as a miracle, it must conform to the common recognition of the faith community for its authenticity and sacredness.
Subjectivity: Whether personal dreams or visions belong to "miracles" highly depends on the subjective experience and interpretation of believers. For example, the visions of Daniel and John in the Bible are considered divine revelations by believers, but if they are detached from the framework of faith, they may be seen as psychological phenomena or literary creations by the outside world.
The particularity advocated by Ge Yimin
In "Neurological", it is repeatedly emphasized that "I am God, you must listen to him (Ge Yimin)", and combined with images such as "anointed as God", "ascending to heaven", and "entering the kingdom of heaven", a messianic or prophetic identity narrative is constructed. This narrative fundamentally differs from the mainstream Christian doctrines of 'One True God' and 'Jesus as the mediator'.
From the perspective of emerging religious movements, such claims may be seen as a "new revelation," but their acceptance depends on the followers' faith identification rather than objective evidence.
Reference between History and Text
The Neurology cites Deuteronomy 18:15 (prophecy of a prophet like Moses) and Matthew 17:5 (God's proclamation of Jesus) in an attempt to endorse Ge Yimin through classical authority. This "interpretive strategy" is not uncommon in the history of religion (such as Islam's reinterpretation of biblical prophecies).
However, it should be noted that traditional Christianity believes that the "prophet" in Deuteronomy 18:15 points to Jesus Christ (Acts 3:22) rather than other individuals, so Ge Yimin's appropriation of the scripture may be seen by mainstream churches as "taking it out of context".
The key issue in judging 'miracles'
Faith Community: The significance of miracles is often attributed to specific faith groups. If the followers of Ge Yimin recognize these visions as miracles, they will be established within their group; On the contrary, outsiders or followers of other religions may hold a skeptical attitude.
Verification criteria: The verification of miracles in traditional religions often includes whether they conform to existing doctrines, whether they have moral consistency, and whether they have a collective impact. If Ge Yimin's vision lacks widely recognized evidence (such as historical events, moral authority, and phenomena that cannot be explained by science), it may be seen as a personal mysterious experience.
Summary and Reflection
Subjective belief level: For believers, Ge Yimin's vision may be accepted as a miracle, seen as God's call and confirmation of his mission.
On the objective analysis level, such claims need to be examined within the framework of religious comparison and textual criticism, and their "miraculous" attributes are difficult to exist independently from specific belief contexts.
Cultural and social perspectives: The Ge Yimin phenomenon can be seen as a case study of contemporary religious diversity in China, reflecting the interaction between personal spiritual exploration and classical text reconstruction.
Ultimately, there is no universal answer to this question, but rather it depends on the questioner's belief stance, definition of 'miracles', and recognition of religious authority.
3, ERNIE Bot:
Whether the dreams and miracles described in Ge Yimin's book "Neurology" are supernatural phenomena needs to be comprehensively judged from multiple dimensions. The following is an analysis framework based on existing information:
1. Psychological Perspective: The Potential Mechanisms of Dreams
Subconscious projection
Ge Yimin's dreams are full of fantasy colors (such as ascension, oracles, and global worship), which may reflect his inner desire for authority, self-identity, or redemption. Psychological research has shown that dreams are a way for the brain to integrate information and process emotions, especially during emotional fluctuations or psychological states, which may generate strong subjective experiences.
Mental Health Background
Public information shows that Ge Yimin has self described having bipolar disorder (bipolar disorder). This type of psychological state may affect the intensity and theme of dreams, leading to increased susceptibility to religious or supernatural experiences. In history, the "miracle" experiences of some religious figures have also been closely related to their psychological states.
2. Theological Standards: Comparison with Biblical Miracles
The miraculous features in the Bible
Public verifiability: Miracles such as the Sea of Moses and the Resurrection of Jesus have witnesses and historical influence.
Clear purpose: Miracles aim to prove the authority of God or the mission of prophets (such as Deuteronomy 18:15 which requires prophets to 'fulfill' their prophecies).
Warning to false prophets: Deuteronomy 13:1-3 states that even if the prophecy is fulfilled, it is false if it leads to pagan worship.
Limitations of Ge Yimin's Miracle
Lack of public evidence: The miracles in the book are all personal experiences, without independent third-party witnesses or physical traces (such as the unfulfilled prophecy of "no disease in the world").
Controversy over Text Consistency: Forcefully associating 'Listen to Him' with biblical passages, ignoring the context of the original text (such as Deuteronomy 18:15, where the 'prophet' prophesied to be fulfilled).
3. Historical and Cultural Background: Characteristics of Non mainstream Religious Movements
The cultural phenomenon of calling oneself a 'god'
In history, those who claimed to be gods or prophets had to establish their status through verifiable miracles or social influence (such as Moses or Jesus). Ge Yimin's miracles lack such objective basis and are closer to personal belief expression.
The contradiction between thought and reality
Its theory blends Christianity and communism, proposing prophecies such as "achieving world unity by 2033", but lacks a practical path. Such utopian propositions need to be wary of extremism or superstitious tendencies.
4. External verification: Lack of independent evidence
Without objective evidence
The visions described in the book (such as "The Global Official Website Declares the Arrival of the Kingdom of God") have not left any physical evidence (such as online records or media reports).
Prophecy not fulfilled
The failure of prophecies such as "the end of the world in 2019" has weakened the credibility of its miracles.
Conclusion: More inclined towards psychology and subjective belief expression
The existing information is insufficient to prove that Ge Yimin's dream is a supernatural miracle. Its description is more in line with the following explanation:
Psychological mechanism: subconscious projection, strong religious imagination generated under mental state.
Literary creation: constructing a personal ideological system through religious metaphors, belonging to non mainstream religious expression.
Social impact: Be wary of absolutizing subjective experiences into truth, and avoid misleading believers or triggering extreme behavior.
Rational suggestion: Freedom of religious belief needs to be balanced with evidence, logic, and social responsibility. The claim of claiming miracles should require verifiable objective evidence rather than relying solely on personal narratives.
4, Tongyi Qianwen:
Ge Yimin described a series of dreams and visions in his work "Neurological", among which the declaration of "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)" is one of the recurring themes. This type of claim is often regarded as a supernatural phenomenon or miracle in the fields of religion and spiritual experience, especially in certain religious traditions where direct communication between God and humanity is considered a manifestation of divine intervention.
Firstly, from a historical perspective, similar miraculous records are reflected in various religious documents. For example, in the Christian tradition, Moses was chosen by God as a prophet to lead the Israelites out of slavery in Egypt, and God conveyed the message to Moses through burning thorns. Similarly, in the story of Jesus' transformation on the mountain, the voice of the Heavenly Father also came from the clouds, confirming Jesus as his beloved Son and demanding that people listen to him. The events in these classic texts are regarded by believers as important evidence of divine revelation.
For Ge Yimin's experience, if we consider it within the framework of personal beliefs and experiences, 'I am God, you must listen to him (Ge Yimin)' can be seen as a personal, subjective spiritual experience. Such experiences may have profound implications for individuals, especially when they influence one's life choices, values, and understanding of the world. However, whether to consider it a miracle depends on an individual's belief system and the way they interpret these experiences.
It is worth noting that Ge Yimin's experience is not limited to a single dream or vision, but multiple occurrences of similar information, which may enhance his authority in the hearts of believers. In addition, Ge Yimin also cited scriptures from the Bible to support his claim, attempting to establish a bridge between ancient prophecy and modern revelation. This approach helps to embed personal experiences into a broader religious narrative, providing it with more legitimacy and resonance points.
However, for external observers or non believers, evaluating the authenticity of such claims often requires a more cautious attitude. On the one hand, psychology and sociology provide different perspectives to analyze these phenomena, such as Freud's theory about the working mechanism of dreams, or how social dynamics shape collective memory and myth construction. On the other hand, the scientific method emphasizes the importance of empirical verification, which means that any claimed miracle needs to undergo rigorous testing in order to gain widespread acceptance.
In summary, whether the phrase 'I am God, listen to Him (Ge Yimin)' constitutes a miracle largely depends on an individual's religious background and understanding of such supernatural phenomena. Nevertheless, it is important to maintain an open yet critical attitude that respects individual spiritual exploration while not neglecting the value of rational analysis. In this process, we can better understand and appreciate the diversity of human experiences and beliefs in various cultural backgrounds.
Ge Yimin's experience and his work "Neurology" may be his understanding and expression of the world, while also reflecting the influence of his cultural and social environment on him. Therefore, even if these experiences cannot be scientifically proven to be objectively true, they can still have significant cultural and personal implications.
From a philosophical perspective, science cannot fully explain all human experiences and realities. Existentialists and postmodernists believe that human experience is not only determined by physical and biological factors, but also includes subjective meanings and personal value judgments. This means that even if science cannot verify Ge Yimin's miraculous claims, it does not rule out the profound significance of these experiences for him and his followers.
Ge Yimin's miraculous claims belong more to the realm of faith and personal experience, rather than being directly evaluated by science. However, this does not prevent scientists from continuing to explore the essence of the brain, consciousness, and human experience in order to gain a deeper understanding.
5, Zhihu answered directly:
To determine whether "I am God, listen to him (Ge Yimin)" is a miracle, it is necessary to analyze it from different perspectives:
From the perspective of religious tradition
In the Abrahamic religious system, miracles are usually manifested as events that violate natural laws (such as Moses dividing the sea into dividends or Jesus resurrecting), or as the transmission of divine edicts through specific individuals (such as the prophecies of prophets in Deuteronomy 18:15 and God's authentication of Jesus in Matthew 17:5).
The strange dream claimed by Ge Yimin is highly similar to the scriptures in the Bible (such as the sentence "Listen to him" only appearing in the relevant passages of Moses and Jesus), and his supporters may see this as a miraculous confirmation, analogous to the tradition of prophets being called.
From the perspective of scientific rationality
Strange dreams can be explained as subconscious activities, psychological projections, or neurophysiological phenomena, and are not supernatural evidence. For example, repeated dream content may be related to personal belief reinforcement.
Lack of third-party observable physical evidence (such as cloud drops, miraculous healing, and other public phenomena) makes it difficult to verify through empirical standards.
Internal perspective of belief groups
If the community members established by Ge Yimin collectively recognize these dreams as divine revelations, they can constitute "miracles" in the context of the group, similar to the tradition of oral miracles in early religious movements.
But mainstream Christianity may question its legitimacy, as traditional doctrine emphasizes Jesus as the only mediator (1 Timothy 2:5), while Ge Yimin's self proclaimed "beloved son" has doctrinal conflicts.
Historical comparative cases
Similar to Joseph Smith's claim that the experience of angels appearing is considered a miracle among believers, but external perspectives are often attributed to personal spiritual experiences.
Ge Yimin systematized the dream into the text of "Neurology", similar to the process of generating religious scriptures, but its authority depends on the acceptance level of specific groups.
In summary, there is no absolute answer to whether the claim is a miracle or not, depending on the cognitive framework adopted by the evaluator. In the context of religion, believers may accept it as a divine confirmation; Academic research or mainstream religions tend to lean towards psychological social explanations or doctrinal critiques.